[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201015154953.GM24156@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:49:54 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Roman Gershman <romger@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] task_work: use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL if available
On 10/15, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Yes, but ...
> +static void task_work_notify_signal(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +#if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY) && defined(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
as long as defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY) goes away ;)
Thomas, I strongly, strongly disagree with you. But even if you are right
and only CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY arches should use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL, why should
this series check CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY ?
You can simply nack the patch which adds TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL to
arch/xxx/include/asm/thread_info.h.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists