lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201015163934.GA9825@magnolia>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:39:34 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: move generic_remap_checks out of mm

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:38:26PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 05:31:21PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > I would like to move all the generic helpers for the vfs remap range
> > functionality (aka clonerange and dedupe) into a separate file so that
> > they won't be scattered across the vfs and the mm subsystems.  The
> > eventual goal is to be able to deselect remap_range.c if none of the
> > filesystems need that code, but the tricky part here is picking a
> > stable(ish) part of the merge window to rearrange code.
> 
> This makes sense to me.  There's nothing page-cache about this function.
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> > index 99c49eeae71b..cf20e5aeb11b 100644
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -3098,8 +3098,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(read_cache_page_gfp);
> >   * LFS limits.  If pos is under the limit it becomes a short access.  If it
> >   * exceeds the limit we return -EFBIG.
> >   */
> > -static int generic_write_check_limits(struct file *file, loff_t pos,
> > -				      loff_t *count)
> > +int generic_write_check_limits(struct file *file, loff_t pos, loff_t *count)
> >  {
> >  	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> >  	loff_t max_size = inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes;
> 
> I wonder if generic_write_check_limits should be in fs/read_write.c --
> it has nothing to do with the pagecache either.

Yeah, probably.

--D

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ