linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver update for 5.10-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201015170123.GA81179@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:01:23 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver update for 5.10-rc1

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:49:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:26 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Included in here are:
> >         - new IIO drivers
> [...]
> >         - no new drivers added or removed
> 
> So which one is it?
> 
> New drivers, or no new drivers, that is the question: Whether 'tis
> nobler in the mind to suffer..
> 
> I do understand what I think you meant (no _staging_ drivers added or
> removed), but it really reads very oddly.

Yes, you are right, I meant "no new staging drivers" were added or
removed.  I forgot what I wrote above by the time I got to the bottom :)

thanks,

greg k-h