linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RCU: fix a typo in comments of rcu_blocking_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201015173732.GY3249@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:37:32 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Cc:     josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: fix a typo in comments of rcu_blocking_is_gp

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:53:03AM +0000, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> There is a tiny typo in comment of function rcu_blocking_is_gp.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>

Good catch, queued, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index f78ee75..4cca03f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3512,7 +3512,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
>   * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
>   * implies a grace period.  Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION.
>   *
> - * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
> + * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
>   * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
>   * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
>   * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited().  It is OK to
> -- 
> 1.7.1
>