[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201015141334.GA20723@rlk>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:13:34 +0800
From: Hui Su <sh_def@....com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, corbet@....net, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sh_def@....com
Subject: [PATCH] docs/rcu: update the api of call_rcu()
update the api of call_rcu()
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@....com>
---
Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
index c7f147b8034f..aa7d5ed20da5 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
@@ -497,8 +497,7 @@ long -- there might be other high-priority work to be done.
In such cases, one uses call_rcu() rather than synchronize_rcu().
The call_rcu() API is as follows::
- void call_rcu(struct rcu_head * head,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
+ void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
This function invokes func(head) after a grace period has elapsed.
This invocation might happen from either softirq or process context,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists