lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:56:43 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpfilter: Fix build error with CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH

On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:53:08 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:37 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:17:49 +0800 YueHaibing wrote:  
> > > IF CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH is set, building fails:
> > >
> > > In file included from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:33:0,
> > >                  from net/bpfilter/main.c:6:
> > > /usr/include/bits/socket.h:390:10: fatal error: asm/socket.h: No such file or directory
> > >  #include <asm/socket.h>
> > >           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > compilation terminated.
> > > scripts/Makefile.userprogs:43: recipe for target 'net/bpfilter/main.o' failed
> > > make[2]: *** [net/bpfilter/main.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > Add missing include path to fix this.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>  
> >
> > Applied, thank you!  
> 
> Please revert. The patch makes no sense.

How so? It's using in-tree headers instead of system ones.
Many samples seem to be doing the same thing.

> Also please don't take bpf patches.

You had it marked it as netdev in your patchwork :/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ