lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:46:20 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
Cc:     "ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
        "bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        "guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com" 
        <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rpmsg: virtio: Move from virtio to rpmsg byte
 conversion

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 07:04:32PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/14/20 1:25 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Use rpmsg byte conversion functions in order for the RPMSG
> > headers and generic functions to be used by external entities.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > index 9006fc7f73d0..793fe924671f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > @@ -19,11 +19,11 @@
> >  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/rpmsg.h>
> > +#include <linux/rpmsg_byteorder.h>
> >  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/virtio.h>
> > -#include <linux/virtio_byteorder.h>
> >  #include <linux/virtio_ids.h>
> >  #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> >  #include <linux/wait.h>
> > @@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ struct virtproc_info {
> >   * Every message sent(/received) on the rpmsg bus begins with this header.
> >   */
> >  struct rpmsg_hdr {
> > -	__virtio32 src;
> > -	__virtio32 dst;
> > -	__virtio32 reserved;
> > -	__virtio16 len;
> > -	__virtio16 flags;
> > +	__rpmsg32 src;
> > +	__rpmsg32 dst;
> > +	__rpmsg32 reserved;
> > +	__rpmsg16 len;
> > +	__rpmsg16 flags;
> >  	u8 data[];
> >  } __packed;
> >  
> > @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ struct rpmsg_hdr {
> >   */
> >  struct rpmsg_ns_msg {
> >  	char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
> > -	__virtio32 addr;
> > -	__virtio32 flags;
> > +	__rpmsg32 addr;
> > +	__rpmsg32 flags;
> >  } __packed;
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -280,6 +280,14 @@ static struct rpmsg_endpoint *__rpmsg_create_ept(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool virtio_rpmsg_is_little_endian(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> > +	struct virtproc_info *vrp = vch->vrp;
> > +
> > +	return virtio_is_little_endian(vrp->vdev);
> > +}
> 
> Regarding this i wonder if the endianess could not be a rpmsg_device field that would be set on 
> __rpmsg_create_channel?
> I don't think that the endianess could change, so perhaps no need to call ops for each conversion
> using interface implemented in rpmsg.h...

That's a valid point - I certainly don't expect the endianness to change
dynamically.

> But perhaps I missed something?
>  
> > +
> >  static struct rpmsg_endpoint *virtio_rpmsg_create_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> >  						      rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb,
> >  						      void *priv,
> > @@ -336,8 +344,8 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> >  		struct rpmsg_ns_msg nsm;
> >  
> >  		strncpy(nsm.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> > -		nsm.addr = cpu_to_virtio32(vrp->vdev, rpdev->ept->addr);
> > -		nsm.flags = cpu_to_virtio32(vrp->vdev, RPMSG_NS_CREATE);
> > +		nsm.addr = cpu_to_rpmsg32(rpdev, rpdev->ept->addr);
> > +		nsm.flags = cpu_to_rpmsg32(rpdev, RPMSG_NS_CREATE);
> >  
> >  		err = rpmsg_sendto(rpdev->ept, &nsm, sizeof(nsm), RPMSG_NS_ADDR);
> >  		if (err)
> > @@ -360,8 +368,8 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> >  		struct rpmsg_ns_msg nsm;
> >  
> >  		strncpy(nsm.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> > -		nsm.addr = cpu_to_virtio32(vrp->vdev, rpdev->ept->addr);
> > -		nsm.flags = cpu_to_virtio32(vrp->vdev, RPMSG_NS_DESTROY);
> > +		nsm.addr = cpu_to_rpmsg32(rpdev, rpdev->ept->addr);
> > +		nsm.flags = cpu_to_rpmsg32(rpdev, RPMSG_NS_DESTROY);
> >  
> >  		err = rpmsg_sendto(rpdev->ept, &nsm, sizeof(nsm), RPMSG_NS_ADDR);
> >  		if (err)
> > @@ -372,6 +380,7 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static const struct rpmsg_device_ops virtio_rpmsg_ops = {
> > +	.is_little_endian = virtio_rpmsg_is_little_endian,
> >  	.create_ept = virtio_rpmsg_create_ept,
> >  	.announce_create = virtio_rpmsg_announce_create,
> >  	.announce_destroy = virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy,
> > @@ -613,10 +622,10 @@ static int rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	msg->len = cpu_to_virtio16(vrp->vdev, len);
> > +	msg->len = cpu_to_rpmsg16(rpdev, len);
> >  	msg->flags = 0;
> > -	msg->src = cpu_to_virtio32(vrp->vdev, src);
> > -	msg->dst = cpu_to_virtio32(vrp->vdev, dst);
> > +	msg->src = cpu_to_rpmsg32(rpdev, src);
> > +	msg->dst = cpu_to_rpmsg32(rpdev, dst);
> >  	msg->reserved = 0;
> >  	memcpy(msg->data, data, len);
> >  
> > @@ -705,14 +714,15 @@ static int rpmsg_recv_single(struct virtproc_info *vrp, struct device *dev,
> >  {
> >  	struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
> >  	struct scatterlist sg;
> > -	unsigned int msg_len = virtio16_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->len);
> > +	bool little_endian = rpmsg_is_little_endian();
> > +	unsigned int msg_len = __rpmsg16_to_cpu(little_endian, msg->len);
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	dev_dbg(dev, "From: 0x%x, To: 0x%x, Len: %d, Flags: %d, Reserved: %d\n",
> > -		virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->src),
> > -		virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->dst), msg_len,
> > -		virtio16_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags),
> > -		virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->reserved));
> > +		__rpmsg32_to_cpu(little_endian, msg->src),
> > +		__rpmsg32_to_cpu(little_endian, msg->dst), msg_len,
> > +		__rpmsg16_to_cpu(little_endian, msg->flags),
> > +		__rpmsg32_to_cpu(little_endian, msg->reserved));
> 
> Nitpicking: sometime rpmsgXX_to_cpu is used, sometime __rpmsgXX_to_cpu, 
> Perhaps only one API should be used... But i don't see any blocking point to use both...:)

Here we have to use __rpmsgXX_to_CPU() because the rpmsg_device is not
available.  It could be fixed but would require a serious amount of refactoring
for little value.  Moreover since this rpmsg_recv_single() is specific to the
virtIO implementation the end result is the same.

> 
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
> 
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> >  	dynamic_hex_dump("rpmsg_virtio RX: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 16, 1,
> >  			 msg, sizeof(*msg) + msg_len, true);
> > @@ -731,7 +741,7 @@ static int rpmsg_recv_single(struct virtproc_info *vrp, struct device *dev,
> >  	/* use the dst addr to fetch the callback of the appropriate user */
> >  	mutex_lock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >  
> > -	ept = idr_find(&vrp->endpoints, virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->dst));
> > +	ept = idr_find(&vrp->endpoints, __rpmsg32_to_cpu(little_endian, msg->dst));
> >  
> >  	/* let's make sure no one deallocates ept while we use it */
> >  	if (ept)
> > @@ -745,7 +755,7 @@ static int rpmsg_recv_single(struct virtproc_info *vrp, struct device *dev,
> >  
> >  		if (ept->cb)
> >  			ept->cb(ept->rpdev, msg->data, msg_len, ept->priv,
> > -				virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->src));
> > +				__rpmsg32_to_cpu(little_endian, msg->src));
> >  
> >  		mutex_unlock(&ept->cb_lock);
> >  
> > @@ -853,13 +863,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
> >  
> >  	strncpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
> >  	chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> > -	chinfo.dst = virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->addr);
> > +	chinfo.dst = rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->addr);
> >  
> >  	dev_info(dev, "%sing channel %s addr 0x%x\n",
> > -		 virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> > +		 rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> >  		 "destroy" : "creat", msg->name, chinfo.dst);
> >  
> > -	if (virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> > +	if (rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> >  		ret = rpmsg_unregister_device(&vrp->vdev->dev, &chinfo);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret);
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ