[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bedfbc723665c979eb73eefadb21970@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:23:40 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fix the interrupt was enabled
accidentally issue.
On 2020-10-12 14:57, Greentime Hu wrote:
> In commit 2ca0b460bbcb ("genirq/affinity: Make affinity setting if
> activated opt-in"),
> it added irqd_affinity_on_activate() checking in the function
> irq_set_affinity_deactivated() so it will return false here.
> In that case, it will call irq_try_set_affinity() -> plic_irq_toggle()
> which will enable the interrupt to cause the CPU hang.
>
> if (irq_set_affinity_deactivated())
> return 0;
> ...
> irq_try_set_affinity(data, mask, force);
>
> [ 919.015783] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> [ 919.020922] rcu: 0-...0: (0 ticks this GP)
> idle=7d2/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1424/1424 fqs=105807
> [ 919.030295] (detected by 1, t=225825 jiffies, g=1561, q=3496)
> [ 919.036109] Task dump for CPU 0:
> [ 919.039321] kworker/0:1 R running task 0 30 2
> 0x00000008
> [ 919.046359] Workqueue: events set_brightness_delayed
> [ 919.051302] Call Trace:
> [ 919.053738] [<ffffffe000930d92>] __schedule+0x194/0x4de
> [ 982.035783] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> [ 982.040923] rcu: 0-...0: (0 ticks this GP)
> idle=7d2/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1424/1424 fqs=113325
> [ 982.050294] (detected by 1, t=241580 jiffies, g=1561, q=3509)
> [ 982.056108] Task dump for CPU 0:
> [ 982.059321] kworker/0:1 R running task 0 30 2
> 0x00000008
> [ 982.066359] Workqueue: events set_brightness_delayed
> [ 982.071302] Call Trace:
> [ 982.073739] [<ffffffe000930d92>] __schedule+0x194/0x4de
> [..]
>
> After applying this patch, the CPU hang issue can be fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> index 4cc8a2657a6d..8a673d9cff69 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -183,10 +183,14 @@ static int plic_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain
> *d, unsigned int irq,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> {
> struct plic_priv *priv = d->host_data;
> + struct irq_data *irqd;
>
> irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, &plic_chip, d->host_data,
> handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL);
> irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> + irqd = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> + irqd_set_single_target(irqd);
> + irqd_set_affinity_on_activate(irqd);
> irq_set_affinity(irq, &priv->lmask);
> return 0;
> }
How does this fix anything? The plic driver doesn't have an activate
callback, so how does it make any difference? I get the feeling this
papers over another issue.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists