linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/include: Update if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:32:01 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
        Mark Starovoytov <mstarovoitov@...vell.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen\" 
        <toke@...hat.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Alexandre Cassen <acassen@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/include: Update if_link.h and netlink.h

On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:23:48 -0700 Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > These are tested to be the latest as part of the tools/lib/bpf build.  
> 
> But you didn't mention why you're making these changes, and you're
> removing a lot of comments without explaining why/where there might be
> a replacement or why the comments are useless. I now see that you're
> adding actual kdoc which is good, except for the part where
> you don't put kdoc on all the structures.

Note that he's just syncing the uAPI headers to tools/

The source of the change is here:

78a3ea555713 ("net: remove comments on struct rtnl_link_stats")
0db0c34cfbc9 ("net: tighten the definition of interface statistics")