linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] security: add fault injection capability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADpXja-oWx7K4Zcsv57boUhg08-JhxzSYiVpWSNh9DfpxKTXjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:00:25 +0300
From:   Aleksandr Nogikh <a.nogikh@...il.com>
To:     "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc:     jmorris@...ei.org, akinobu.mita@...il.com,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] security: add fault injection capability

On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 18:30, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
[...]
> seeing 'should_fail' here, kind of out of context, would be confusing to
> thousands of ppl reading the code and wondering why it should fail.  maybe
> "inject_fail_lsm_hook()" ?

Sounds reasonable, thank you for the suggestion. I'll rename this
function in v2.