[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201016070759.GA12905@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 08:07:59 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org,
zhangfei.gao@...aro.org, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com, arnd@...db.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-accelerators@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kevin.tian@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] iommu: Add IOMMU_UNBIND_FAULT_PENDING flag
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:00:29AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> IOMMU drivers only need to flush their PRI queue when faults might be
> pending. According to the PCIe spec (quoted below) this only happens
> when using the "Stop Marker" method. Otherwise the function waits for
> pending faults before signaling to the device driver that it can
> unbind().
>
> Add the IOMMU_UNBIND_FAULT_PENDING flags to unbind(), to tell the IOMMU
> driver whether it's worth flushing the queue.
As we have no code using the "stop marker" method please just remove
the code entirely instead of adding a flag that is just dead code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists