[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <018b01d6a391$f06fc310$d14f4930$@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:57:05 +0900
From: "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
To: "'Tetsuhiro Kohada'" <kohada.t2@...il.com>
Cc: <kohada.tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
<mori.takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
"'Sungjong Seo'" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] exfat: aggregate dir-entry updates into
__exfat_write_inode().
> *inode) static int exfat_map_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu_offset,
> unsigned int *clu, int create)
> {
> - int ret, modified = false;
> + int ret;
> unsigned int last_clu;
> struct exfat_chain new_clu;
> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> @@ -184,6 +185,11 @@ static int exfat_map_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu_offset,
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> + exfat_warn(sb, "alloc[%lu]@map: %lld (%d - %08x)",
> + inode->i_ino, i_size_read(inode),
> + (clu_offset << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits) * 512,
> + last_clu);
Is this leftover print from debugging?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists