[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1jk0vqk0ju.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:00:37 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
"open list\:ARM\/Amlogic Meson..."
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, Da Xue <da@...re.computer>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: cancel timer before starting it
On Fri 16 Oct 2020 at 10:52, Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com> wrote:
> On Thursday 15 Oct 2020 at 13:45:54 (-0500), Jassi Brar wrote:
> [..]
>> > >> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
>> > >> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
>> > >> @@ -82,9 +82,13 @@ static void msg_submit(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> > >> exit:
>> > >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags);
>> > >>
>> > >> - if (!err && (chan->txdone_method & TXDONE_BY_POLL))
>> > >> - /* kick start the timer immediately to avoid delays */
>> > >> + if (!err && (chan->txdone_method & TXDONE_BY_POLL)) {
>> > >> + /* Disable the timer if already active ... */
>> > >> + hrtimer_cancel(&chan->mbox->poll_hrt);
>> > >> +
>> > >> + /* ... and kick start it immediately to avoid delays */
>> > >> hrtimer_start(&chan->mbox->poll_hrt, 0, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>> > >> + }
>> > >> }
>> > >>
>> > >> static void tx_tick(struct mbox_chan *chan, int r)
>> > >
>> > > I've tracked a regression back to this commit. Details to reproduce:
>> >
>> > Hi Ionela,
>> >
>> > I don't have access to your platform and I don't get what is going on
>> > from the log below.
>> >
>> > Could you please give us a bit more details about what is going on ?
>> >
>> > All this patch does is add hrtimer_cancel().
>> > * It is needed if the timer had already been started, which is
>> > appropriate AFAIU
>> > * It is a NO-OP is the timer is not active.
>> >
>> Can you please try using hrtimer_try_to_cancel() instead ?
>>
>
> Yes, using hrtimer_try_to_cancel() instead works for me. But doesn't
> this limit how effective this change is? AFAIU, this will possibly only
> reduce the chances for the race condition, but not solve it.
>
It is also my understanding, hrtimer_try_to_cancel() would remove a
timer which as not already started but would return withtout doing
anything if the callback is already running ... which is the original
problem
> Thanks,
> Ionela.
>
>> thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists