[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201016023141.85300-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:31:41 +0800
From: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
To: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <dima@...sta.com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<jpoimboe@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<christian.brauner@...ntu.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
<ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>, <amanieu@...il.com>, <walken@...gle.com>,
<ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
<vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nixiaoming@...wei.com>,
<wangle6@...wei.com>, <luohaizheng@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm:traps: Don't print stack or raw PC/LR hex values in backtraces
Printing raw pointer values in backtraces has potential security
implications and are of questionable value anyway.
This patch follows x86 and arm64's lead and removes the "Exception stack:"
dump from kernel backtraces:
commit a25ffd3a6302a6 ("arm64: traps: Don't print stack or raw
PC/LR values in backtraces")
commit bb5e5ce545f203 ("x86/dumpstack: Remove kernel text
addresses from stack dump")
Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
-------
v2:
Delete [<hex numbers>] from the stack according to the email discussion
in patch V1, Other information processing will be discussed in subsequent
patches.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201009075957.110017-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com/
1. Don't print stack or raw PC/LR hex values in backtraces
2. Don't print stack mem in backtraces
3. if (!panic_on_oops), Don't print stack mem in __die()
---
arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 3 +--
arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
index 8e6ace03e960..71c9e5597d39 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
@@ -121,8 +121,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
printk("PC is at %pS\n", (void *)instruction_pointer(regs));
printk("LR is at %pS\n", (void *)regs->ARM_lr);
- printk("pc : [<%08lx>] lr : [<%08lx>] psr: %08lx\n",
- regs->ARM_pc, regs->ARM_lr, regs->ARM_cpsr);
+ printk("psr: %08lx\n", regs->ARM_cpsr);
printk("sp : %08lx ip : %08lx fp : %08lx\n",
regs->ARM_sp, regs->ARM_ip, regs->ARM_fp);
printk("r10: %08lx r9 : %08lx r8 : %08lx\n",
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 17d5a785df28..911bbf164875 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, unsigned long from,
unsigned long end = frame + 4 + sizeof(struct pt_regs);
#ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
- printk("%s[<%08lx>] (%ps) from [<%08lx>] (%pS)\n",
- loglvl, where, (void *)where, from, (void *)from);
+ printk("%s (%ps) from (%pS)\n",
+ loglvl, (void *)where, (void *)from);
#else
printk("%sFunction entered at [<%08lx>] from [<%08lx>]\n",
loglvl, where, from);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists