[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rhyv7a8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:39:43 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, Roman Gershman <romger@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] task_work: use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL if available
On Fri, Oct 16 2020 at 11:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15 2020 at 12:39, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/15/20 9:49 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> So if you change #2 to:
>
> Drop the CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY dependency, make _all_ architectures
> use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL and clean up the jobctl and whatever related
> mess.
>
> and actually act apon it, then I'm fine with that approach.
Which makes me rethink my view on Olegs suggestion:
>>> You can simply nack the patch which adds TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL to
>>> arch/xxx/include/asm/thread_info.h.
That's a truly great suggestion:
X86 is going to have that TIF bit once the above is available.
I'm happy to help with the merge logistics of this.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists