linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] can: flexcan: add CAN wakeup function for i.MX8QM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:40:02 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Ying Liu <victor.liu@....com>,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] can: flexcan: add CAN wakeup function for i.MX8QM

On 10/16/20 12:00 PM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>>>> +static int flexcan_stop_mode_enable_scfw(struct flexcan_priv *priv,
>>>> +bool enabled) {
>>>> +	u8 idx = priv->can_idx;
>>>> +	u32 rsrc_id, val;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (idx == 0)
>>>> +		rsrc_id = IMX_SC_R_CAN_0;
>>>> +	else if (idx == 1)
>>>> +		rsrc_id = IMX_SC_R_CAN_1;
>>>> +	else
>>>> +		rsrc_id = IMX_SC_R_CAN_2;
>>>
>>> Can you introduce something like and make use of it:
>>>
>>> #define IMX_SC_R_CAN(x)			(105 + (x))
>> OK.
> 
> I thought it over again, from my point of view, use macro here directly could
> be more intuitive, and can achieve a direct jump.
> If change to above wrapper, on the contrary make confusion, and generate the
> magic number 105. ☹

The define should go into the rsrc.h, and probably be:

#define IMX_SC_R_CAN(x)		(IMX_SC_R_CAN_0 + (x))	

and if you change the firmware interface, you probably have more problems :)

>>>> +
>>>> +	if (enabled)
>>>> +		val = 1;
>>>> +	else
>>>> +		val = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* stop mode request via scu firmware */
>>>> +	return imx_sc_misc_set_control(priv->sc_ipc_handle, rsrc_id,
>>>> +IMX_SC_C_IPG_STOP, val); }
> 
> We still need use IMX_SC_C_IPG_STOP, why not be consistent?

Sorry I don't get what you want to tell me here.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)