[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpP6xBru79Xh2oe=J8HWO3uk1VpcMzEiG6X7WX-AOvgkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:30:30 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/23] wfx: add bus_sdio.c
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 12:47, Jerome Pouiller
<Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Please fill out this commit message to explain a bit more about the
patch and the HW it enables support for.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_sdio.c | 269 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 269 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_sdio.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bus_sdio.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e06d7e1ebe9c
[...]
> +
> +static int wfx_sdio_irq_subscribe(void *priv)
> +{
> + struct wfx_sdio_priv *bus = priv;
> + u32 flags;
> + int ret;
> + u8 cccr;
> +
I would appreciate a comment about an out-of-band IRQ line. If it's
supported, that is the preferred option to use, else the SDIO IRQs.
> + if (!bus->of_irq) {
> + sdio_claim_host(bus->func);
> + ret = sdio_claim_irq(bus->func, wfx_sdio_irq_handler);
> + sdio_release_host(bus->func);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + sdio_claim_host(bus->func);
> + cccr = sdio_f0_readb(bus->func, SDIO_CCCR_IENx, NULL);
> + cccr |= BIT(0);
> + cccr |= BIT(bus->func->num);
> + sdio_f0_writeb(bus->func, cccr, SDIO_CCCR_IENx, NULL);
> + sdio_release_host(bus->func);
> + flags = irq_get_trigger_type(bus->of_irq);
> + if (!flags)
> + flags = IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH;
> + flags |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
> + return devm_request_threaded_irq(&bus->func->dev, bus->of_irq, NULL,
> + wfx_sdio_irq_handler_ext, flags,
> + "wfx", bus);
> +}
> +
[...]
> +
> +#define SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS 0x0000
> +#define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200 0x1000
> +static const struct sdio_device_id wfx_sdio_ids[] = {
> + { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200) },
> + // FIXME: ignore VID/PID and only rely on device tree
> + // { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_ANY_ID, SDIO_ANY_ID) },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, wfx_sdio_ids);
I will comment about the sdio IDs separately, replying to the other
thread between you and Pali.
> +
> +struct sdio_driver wfx_sdio_driver = {
> + .name = "wfx-sdio",
> + .id_table = wfx_sdio_ids,
> + .probe = wfx_sdio_probe,
> + .remove = wfx_sdio_remove,
> + .drv = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = wfx_sdio_of_match,
> + }
> +};
I couldn't find where you call sdio_register|unregister_driver(), but
maybe that's done from another patch in series?
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists