[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201016114510.GO2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:45:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: ira.weiny@...el.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 6/9] x86/entry: Pass irqentry_state_t by reference
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:42:55PM -0700, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> -noinstr bool idtentry_enter_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +noinstr void idtentry_enter_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs, irqentry_state_t *irq_state)
> {
> - bool irq_state = lockdep_hardirqs_enabled();
> + irq_state->exit_rcu = lockdep_hardirqs_enabled();
>
> __nmi_enter();
> lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
> @@ -222,15 +222,13 @@ noinstr bool idtentry_enter_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
> trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
> ftrace_nmi_enter();
> instrumentation_end();
> -
> - return irq_state;
> }
>
> -noinstr void idtentry_exit_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs, bool restore)
> +noinstr void idtentry_exit_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs, irqentry_state_t *irq_state)
> {
> instrumentation_begin();
> ftrace_nmi_exit();
> - if (restore) {
> + if (irq_state->exit_rcu) {
> trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(CALLER_ADDR0);
> }
> @@ -238,7 +236,7 @@ noinstr void idtentry_exit_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs, bool restore)
>
> rcu_nmi_exit();
> lockdep_hardirq_exit();
> - if (restore)
> + if (irq_state->exit_rcu)
> lockdep_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0);
> __nmi_exit();
> }
That's not nice.. The NMI path is different from the IRQ path and has a
different variable. Yes, this works, but *groan*.
Maybe union them if you want to avoid bloating the structure, but the
above makes it really hard to read.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists