[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUof5Yb=5notGDYycJtZyLzGp2RPjJ=m6GVodBRDxw9ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:50:34 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: media: max9286: Document 'maxim,high-threshold'
Hi Jacopo,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:09 PM Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org> wrote:
> Document the 'maxim,high-threshold' vendor property in the bindings
> document of the max9286 driver.
>
> The newly introduced boolean property allows controlling the initial
> configuration of the GMSL reverse control channel to accommodate
> remote serializers pre-programmed with the high threshold power
> supply noise immunity enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max9286.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max9286.yaml
> @@ -51,6 +51,19 @@ properties:
> '#gpio-cells':
> const: 2
>
> + maxim,high-threshold:
> + description: |
> + A boolean property to increase the initial amplitude of the reverse
> + control channel to compensate for remote serializers pre-programmed with
> + high threshold noise-immunity.
> +
> + Some camera modules (in example the RDACM20 one) include an on-board MCU
> + that pre-programs the embedded serializer with reverse channel power
> + supply noise immunity enabled. The deserializer shall increase its
> + reverse channel amplitude to compensate that and be able to communicate
> + with the remote end.
> + type: boolean
Does this "high" threshold correspond to some numerical value?
I.e. could we run into a future need to support more values than just
true/false?
If yes, we may want to use a numerical value from the start.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists