[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201016120749.GG22589@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:07:49 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: avoid a unnecessary reschedule in
shrink_slab()
On Fri 16-10-20 11:39:52, Xianting Tian wrote:
> In shrink_slab(), it directly goes to 'out' label only when it
> can't get the lock of shrinker_rwsew. In this case, it doesn't
> do the real work of shrinking slab, so we don't need trigger a
> reschedule by cond_resched().
Your changelog doesn't explain why this is not needed or undesirable. Do
you see any actual problem?
The point of this code is to provide a deterministic scheduling point
regardless of the shrinker_rwsew.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@....com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 466fc3144..676e97b28 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> }
>
> up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> -out:
> +
> cond_resched();
> +out:
> return freed;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists