[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b55ffe1-95fc-1e71-ea6b-82bd0a98a6b4@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:17:06 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 20/29] virtio-mem: nb_sb_per_mb and subblock_size are
specific to Sub Block Mode (SBM)
On 16.10.20 10:53, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:53:14PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's rename to "sbs_per_mb" and "sb_size" and move accordingly.
>>
>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
> One trivial suggestion, could we move this patch close the data structure
> movement patch?
>
> I know this would be some work, since you have changed some of the code logic.
> This would take you some time to rebase.
You mean after patch #17 ?
I guess I can move patch #18 (prereq) a little further up (e.g., after
patch #15). Guess moving it in front of #19 shouldn't be too hard.
Will give it a try - if it takes too much effort, I'll leave it like this.
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists