[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201016143200.tev62sbttbac5kci@Rk>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:32:00 +0800
From: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
To: Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn@...tonmail.com>
Cc: "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: add polling mode based on connected GPIO
chip's pin status
Hi Barnabás,
Thank you for reviewing theis patch! I've Cced a new version to you.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:33:50AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I believe this patch causes I2C HID devices not to work with IRQs after resuming
>from suspend.
>
>
>> [...]
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> @@ -1183,7 +1292,8 @@ static int i2c_hid_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> /* Save some power */
>> i2c_hid_set_power(client, I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP);
>>
>> - disable_irq(client->irq);
>> + if (polling_mode == I2C_POLLING_DISABLED)
>> + disable_irq(client->irq);
>>
>
>The IRQ is disabled when suspending if polling is *off*.
>
>
>> if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev)) {
>> wake_status = enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
>> @@ -1216,7 +1326,7 @@ static int i2c_hid_resume(struct device *dev)
>>
>> if (ihid->pdata.post_power_delay_ms)
>> msleep(ihid->pdata.post_power_delay_ms);
>> - } else if (ihid->irq_wake_enabled) {
>> + } else if (ihid->irq_wake_enabled && polling_mode != I2C_POLLING_DISABLED) {
>
>As a side note, I'm not sure if the 'polling_mode != I2C_POLLING_DISABLED' part
>is necessary (or that it's necessary *here*). It causes 'i2c_hid_resume' and
>'i2c_hid_suspend' to be "asymmetric" which - I believe - may cause problems.
>
>
>> wake_status = disable_irq_wake(client->irq);
>> if (!wake_status)
>> ihid->irq_wake_enabled = false;
>> @@ -1225,7 +1335,8 @@ static int i2c_hid_resume(struct device *dev)
>> wake_status);
>> }
>>
>> - enable_irq(client->irq);
>> + if (polling_mode != I2C_POLLING_DISABLED)
>> + enable_irq(client->irq);
>>
>
>The IRQ is enabled when resuming if polling is *on*. It should be enabled if polling is *off*
>in my opinion.
>
>
>> [...]
>
>
>Regards,
>Barnabás Pőcze
--
Best regards,
Coiby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists