[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201016145138.GB21989@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:51:38 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Roman Gershman <romger@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] task_work: use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL if available
On 10/16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> With moving the handling into get_signal() you don't need more changes
> to arch/* than adding the TIF bit, right?
we still need to do something like
- if (thread_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
+ if (thread_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
do_signal(...);
and add _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL to the WORK-PENDING mask in arch/* code.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists