[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1a4c312-2fbf-b149-bd43-7190af75ca24@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:31:26 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: martin.petersen@...cle.com, bvanassche@....org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] sgl_alloc_order: fix memory leak
On 10/15/20 12:57 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> sgl_alloc_order() can fail when 'length' is large on a memory
> constrained system. When order > 0 it will potentially be
> making several multi-page allocations with the later ones more
> likely to fail than the earlier one. So it is important that
> sgl_alloc_order() frees up any pages it has obtained before
> returning NULL. In the case when order > 0 it calls the wrong
> free page function and leaks. In testing the leak was
> sufficient to bring down my 8 GiB laptop with OOM.
I've picked this one up, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists