[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201016163634.857573-1-wvw@google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:36:33 -0700
From: Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: wei.vince.wang@...il.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
qperret@...gle.com, Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: cpufreq_schedutil: maintain raw cache when next_f is
not changed
Currently, raw cache will be reset when next_f is changed after
get_next_freq for correctness. However, it may introduce more
cycles. This patch changes it to maintain the cached value instead of
dropping it.
This is adapted from https://android-review.googlesource.com/1352810/
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 5ae7b4e6e8d6..ae3ae7fcd027 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct sugov_policy {
s64 freq_update_delay_ns;
unsigned int next_freq;
unsigned int cached_raw_freq;
+ unsigned int prev_cached_raw_freq;
/* The next fields are only needed if fast switch cannot be used: */
struct irq_work irq_work;
@@ -165,6 +166,7 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
return sg_policy->next_freq;
sg_policy->need_freq_update = false;
+ sg_policy->prev_cached_raw_freq = sg_policy->cached_raw_freq;
sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = freq;
return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq);
}
@@ -464,8 +466,8 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq) {
next_f = sg_policy->next_freq;
- /* Reset cached freq as next_freq has changed */
- sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = 0;
+ /* Restore cached freq as next_freq has changed */
+ sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = sg_policy->prev_cached_raw_freq;
}
/*
@@ -828,6 +830,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
sg_policy->limits_changed = false;
sg_policy->need_freq_update = false;
sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = 0;
+ sg_policy->prev_cached_raw_freq = 0;
for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, cpu);
--
2.29.0.rc1.297.gfa9743e501-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists