[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201016050347.ers54itzmxgijzsy@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:47 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
nks@...wful.org, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle
probe deferral properly
On 14-10-20, 18:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On this platform (r8a7791-koelsch.dts), there is no opp table in DT.
>
> Before:
I assume this means before this patchset came in..
> boot:
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:362
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:95
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:102: clk_get() returned z
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:120:
> dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:125: find_supply_name() returned cpu0
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:132: regulator_get_optional()
> returned -EPROBE_DEFER
> cpu cpu0: cpu0 regulator not ready, retry
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:371:
> resources_available() returned -517
we deferred probe once.
> ...
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:362
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:95
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:102: clk_get() returned z
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:120:
> dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:125: find_supply_name() returned cpu0
> cpu cpu0: resources_available:132: regulator_get_optional()
> returned (ptrval)
found regulator next time.
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:371:
> resources_available() returned 0
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:375
> cpufreq_dt: cpufreq_init:162
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:170: clk_get() returned z
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:179: dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() returned -2
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:198: find_supply_name() returned cpu0
> <i2c comm>
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:201: dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() returned (ptrval)
> <i2c comm>
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:230: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:239: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: OPP table is not ready, deferring probe
This failed, as we couldn't have deferred probe from cpufreq_init.
Which means that cpufreq didn't work here.
> cpufreq_dt: cpufreq_init:162
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:170: clk_get() returned z
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:179: dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() returned -2
> cpu cpu1: no regulator for cpu1
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:198: find_supply_name() returned (null)
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:230: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() returned 0
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:239: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() returned 0
> cpu cpu1: OPP table is not ready, deferring probe
Same for CPU1.
>
> s2ram:
> cpufreq_dt: cpufreq_init:162
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:170: clk_get() returned z
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:179: dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() returned -2
> cpu cpu1: no regulator for cpu1
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:198: find_supply_name() returned (null)
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:230: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() returned 0
> cpu cpu1: cpufreq_init:239: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() returned 0
> cpu cpu1: OPP table is not ready, deferring probe
And same here.
> CPU1 is up
>
> After:
> boot:
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:356
> cpufreq_dt: dt_cpufreq_early_init:251
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:256
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:271: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table()
> returned (ptrval)
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:284: find_supply_name() returned cpu0
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:288: dev_pm_opp_set_regulators()
> returned -EPROBE_DEFER
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:360:
> dt_cpufreq_early_init() returned -517
> ...
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:356
> cpufreq_dt: dt_cpufreq_early_init:251
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:256
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:271: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table()
> returned (ptrval)
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:284: find_supply_name() returned cpu0
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:288: dev_pm_opp_set_regulators()
> returned (ptrval)
> cpu cpu0: dt_cpufreq_early_init:301:
> dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() returned -2
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:360:
> dt_cpufreq_early_init() returned 0
> cpufreq_dt: dt_cpufreq_early_init:251
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:360:
> dt_cpufreq_early_init() returned 0
> cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: dt_cpufreq_probe:365
> cpufreq_dt: cpufreq_init:114
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:124: clk_get() returned z
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:142: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:151: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: OPP table can't be empty
Same issue here.
> cpufreq_dt: cpufreq_init:114
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:124: clk_get() returned z
> <i2c comm>
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:142: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:151: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() returned 0
>
> s2ram:
>
> cpufreq_dt: cpufreq_init:114
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:124: clk_get() returned z
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14 at drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h:54
> __i2c_transfer+0x2d8/0x310
> i2c i2c-6: Transfer while suspended
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:142: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: cpufreq_init:151: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() returned 0
> cpu cpu0: OPP table can't be empty
> CPU1 is up
>
> I hope this helps.
Unfortunately it raised more questions than what it answered :(
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists