[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874kmtyxdg.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 21:12:27 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: ajd@...ux.ibm.com, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com,
biwen.li@....com, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, cheloha@...ux.ibm.com,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, clg@...d.org,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com, fthain@...egraphics.com.au,
gromero@...ux.ibm.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
hofrat@...dl.org, jniethe5@...il.com,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
leobras.c@...il.com, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
liushixin2@...wei.com, mahesh@...ux.ibm.com,
miaoqinglang@...wei.com, mrochs@...ux.ibm.com,
nathanl@...ux.ibm.com,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>, wangwensheng4@...wei.com,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, yanaijie@...wei.com,
yangyingliang@...wei.com, zhengbin <zhengbin13@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-5.10-1 tag
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 8:24 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> Just two minor conflicts I'm aware of. The only slight subtlety is the conflict
>> in kasan_init() where "int ret" needs to move out of the for_each_mem_range()
>> and up to the function scope.
>
> Well, there was also a conflict for the dependencies of OCXL.
Yep, it was so trivial I didn't think it was worth calling out.
> I resolved that by ruthlessly simplifying the dependency:
>
> - depends on PPC_POWERNV && PCI && EEH && HOTPLUG_PCI_POWERNV
> - depends on PPC_POWERNV && PCI && EEH && PPC_XIVE_NATIVE
> ++ depends on HOTPLUG_PCI_POWERNV
>
> because all the other dependencies seem to be pointless.
>
> HOTPLUG_PCI_POWERNV already has a
>
> depends on PPC_POWERNV && EEH
>
> so there's no point in repeating those.
And PPC_POWERNV selects FORCE_PCI, which takes care of the dependency on
PCI.
> And PPC_XIVE_NATIVE is selected by PPC_POWERNV, so if PPC_POWERNV, we
> know PPC_XIVE_NATIVE is set.
>
> Maybe I missed something strange, so I'm just letting you know so you
> can blame me if I broke something.
No, that looks good to me. Thanks.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists