linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.9 00/15] 5.9.1-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201017113430.GC2978968@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Oct 2020 13:34:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.9 00/15] 5.9.1-rc1 review

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 05:45:56PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 16/10/2020 10:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.1 release.
> > There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:04:25 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> There is one test failure (new warning) for Tegra194 but this is a known
> issue for v5.9 and is fixed by Viresh's change [0]. Maybe we can pull
> into stable once it is merged to the mainline?	

Please let me know if this hits Linus's tree and I don't pick it up.

> 
> That said everything else looks good ...
> 
> Test results for stable-v5.9:
>     15 builds:	15 pass, 0 fail
>     26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
>     61 tests:	60 pass, 1 fail
> 
> Linux version:	5.9.1-rc1-g1cbc5f2d0eac
> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>                 tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>                 tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>                 tegra30-cardhu-a04
> 
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h