[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201017021151.28104-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:11:51 -0400
From: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<osalvador@...e.de>, <mhocko@...e.com>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
<linfeilong@...wei.com>, <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] mm: fix potential pte_unmap_unlock pte error
When flags don't have MPOL_MF_MOVE or MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL bits, code breaks
and passing origin pte - 1 to pte_unmap_unlock seems like not a good idea.
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 3fde772ef5ef..3ca4898f3f24 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long flags = qp->flags;
int ret;
bool has_unmovable = false;
- pte_t *pte;
+ pte_t *pte, *mapped_pte;
spinlock_t *ptl;
ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
return 0;
- pte = pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
+ mapped_pte = pte = pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
if (!pte_present(*pte))
continue;
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
} else
break;
}
- pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
+ pte_unmap_unlock(mapped_pte, ptl);
cond_resched();
if (has_unmovable)
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists