linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: serial: option: add Quectel EC200T module support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 01:07:10 +0800
From:   septs <job@...ts.email>
To:     "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Johan Hovold" <johan@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, septs <kernel@...ts.pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: serial: option: add Quectel EC200T module support

Add usb product id of the Quectel EC200T module.

Signed-off-by: septs <kernel@...ts.pw>
---
 drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
index 2a3bfd6f8..7e879233b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static void option_instat_callback(struct urb *urb);
 #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EP06			0x0306
 #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EM12			0x0512
 #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q			0x0800
+#define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EC200T			0x6026
 
 #define CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID			0x16d8
 #define CMOTECH_PRODUCT_6001			0x6001
@@ -1117,6 +1118,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = {
 	{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q, 0xff, 0, 0) },
 	{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q, 0xff, 0xff, 0x10),
 	  .driver_info = ZLP },
+	{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EC200T, 0xff, 0, 0) },
 
 	{ USB_DEVICE(CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID, CMOTECH_PRODUCT_6001) },
 	{ USB_DEVICE(CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID, CMOTECH_PRODUCT_CMU_300) },
-- 
2.25.1


On Sun, Oct 18, 2020, at 20:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 06:51:11PM +0800, septs wrote:
> > Add usb product id of the Quectel EC200T module.
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> > index 2a3bfd6f8..7e879233b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> > @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static void option_instat_callback(struct urb *urb);
> >  #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EP06			0x0306
> >  #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EM12			0x0512
> >  #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q			0x0800
> > +#define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EC200T			0x6026
> >  
> >  #define CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID			0x16d8
> >  #define CMOTECH_PRODUCT_6001			0x6001
> > @@ -1117,6 +1118,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = {
> >  	{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q, 0xff, 0, 0) },
> >  	{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q, 0xff, 0xff, 0x10),
> >  	  .driver_info = ZLP },
> > +	{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EC200T, 0xff, 0, 0) },
> >  
> >  	{ USB_DEVICE(CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID, CMOTECH_PRODUCT_6001) },
> >  	{ USB_DEVICE(CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID, CMOTECH_PRODUCT_CMU_300) },
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
> 
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
> 
> - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
>   kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after
>   adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of the
>   email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
>   email signature.
> 
> 
> - It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either
>   the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to
>   match).  Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>   for how to do this correctly.
> 
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h's patch email bot
>