linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 067/111] reiserfs: only call unlock_new_inode() if I

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201018191807.4052726-67-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:17:23 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        syzbot+187510916eb6a14598f7@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 067/111] reiserfs: only call unlock_new_inode() if I_NEW

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 8859bf2b1278d064a139e3031451524a49a56bd0 ]

unlock_new_inode() is only meant to be called after a new inode has
already been inserted into the hash table.  But reiserfs_new_inode() can
call it even before it has inserted the inode, triggering the WARNING in
unlock_new_inode().  Fix this by only calling unlock_new_inode() if the
inode has the I_NEW flag set, indicating that it's in the table.

This addresses the syzbot report "WARNING in unlock_new_inode"
(https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=187510916eb6a14598f7).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200628070057.820213-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+187510916eb6a14598f7@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
index 1509775da040a..e3af44c61524d 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
@@ -2163,7 +2163,8 @@ int reiserfs_new_inode(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
 out_inserted_sd:
 	clear_nlink(inode);
 	th->t_trans_id = 0;	/* so the caller can't use this handle later */
-	unlock_new_inode(inode); /* OK to do even if we hadn't locked it */
+	if (inode->i_state & I_NEW)
+		unlock_new_inode(inode);
 	iput(inode);
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.25.1