[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1812241.n2eA9Fn7ml@n95hx1g2>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:44:10 +0200
From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
CC: Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"David Laight" <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] i2c: imx: Fix handling of arbitration loss
Hi Wolfram,
On Saturday, 10 October 2020, 13:06:58 CEST, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Changes in v5:
> Changes in v6 were missing... Because patch 1 was updated, I reverted it
> from for-current and will apply this series to for-next instead to give
> it some more time for testing.
can may patches be merged into for-current for -RC2 or RC3?
Best regards
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists