[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201019154933.424b1fac@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:49:33 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] drivers/net/wan/hdlc: In hdlc_rcv, check to make
sure dev is an HDLC device
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:36:14 -0700 Xie He wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 2:22 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Looks correct to me. I spotted there is also IFF_WAN_HDLC added by
> > 7cdc15f5f9db ("WAN: Generic HDLC now uses IFF_WAN_HDLC private flag.")
> > would using that flag also be correct and cleaner potentially?
> >
> > Up to you, just wanted to make sure you considered it.
>
> Oh, Yes! I see IFF_WAN_HDLC is set for all HDLC devices. I also
> searched through the kernel code and see no other uses of
> IFF_WAN_HDLC. So I think we can use IFF_WAN_HDLC to reliably check if
> a device is an HDLC device. This should be cleaner than checking
> ndo_start_xmit.
>
> Thanks! I'll change this patch to use IFF_WAN_HDLC.
Cool! FWIW when you resend you can also trim the subject to just say:
net: hdlc: In hdlc_rcv, check to make sure dev is an HDLC device
There's no need for the full file path.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists