linux-kernel - Re: [perf metricgroup] fcc9c5243c: perf-sanity-tests.Parse_and_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201019015225.GI466880@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:52:25 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        linux-imx@....com, 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [perf metricgroup] fcc9c5243c:
 perf-sanity-tests.Parse_and_process_metrics.fail

> I believe this is a Skylake and there is a known bug in the Skylake
> metric DRAM_Parallel_Reads as described here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAP-5=fXejVaQa9qfW66cY77qB962+jbe8tT5bsLoOOcFmODnWQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Fixing the bug needs more knowledge than what is available in manuals.
> Hopefully Intel can take a look.

Oh I missed the original mail for some reason.  Yes it should be cmask instead of thresh
for client.  I think thresh is used on the server uncore only, not on the client.

Jin Yao, can you send a patch please?

-Andi