linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v39 08/24] x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201019123934.GA24325@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:39:34 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
        Serge Ayoun <serge.ayoun@...el.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, asapek@...gle.com,
        cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
        kai.svahn@...el.com, kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com,
        luto@...nel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
        puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        yaozhangx@...gle.com, mikko.ylinen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v39 08/24] x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page
 Cache (EPC) sections

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:45:58AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 07:50:43AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > +config INTEL_SGX
> 
> Since the directory for this was renamed some iterations ago from
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx to intel_sgx given the feedback from Boris,
> I'm wondering should this also be renamed as X86_SGX?

I don't think it matters. I hardly doubt there will be anything else
"SGX" besides the Intel one...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette