[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPecUBTqbyiQQRdSPq_YuBAF+ut3RbM9AcW8nyciJyw8ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:13:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: Binding for MStar MSC313 GPIO controller
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 18:36, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 4:48 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com> wrote:
>
> > Add a binding description for the MStar/SigmaStar GPIO controller
> > found in the MSC313 and later ARMv7 SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
>
> I think Krzysztof is working on some generic bindings that
> will make it easier to write YAML GPIO controller bindings,
> but I don't know the status of them. I would be happy to merge
> them early for v5.11 though.
Hi,
The generic GPIO controller dtschema got dropped because Rob wants it
to be part of dtschema (outside of kernel) and then
relicensing/rewriting property descriptions plays a role. Only the
GPIO hogs went to common dtschema package.
Therefore as of now, one should include all generic properties
directly in the GPIO controller bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists