[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DVxyR+h_jqDiJyx=UxYaWtYNG2iXso2CZ3EF3BRenuag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:55:52 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add node for SPDIF
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:00 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > + spdif1: spdif@...90000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-spdif", "fsl,imx35-spdif";
>
> This does not pass the dtschema validation, so only "fsl,imx35-spdif".
Shouldn't the dt schema validation be changed then to accept this format?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists