linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/13] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201019171822.GD2701355@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:18:22 -0400
From:   Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To:     Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>
Cc:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        luto@...capital.net, trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 04:51:51PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 08:26:54PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > >
> > > I am discussing with Ross the other option. We can create
> > > .rodata.mle_header section and put it at fixed offset as
> > > kernel_info is. So, we would have, e.g.:
> > >
> > > arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S:
> > >         .rodata.kernel_info KERNEL_INFO_OFFSET : {
> > >                 *(.rodata.kernel_info)
> > >         }
> > >         ASSERT(ABSOLUTE(kernel_info) == KERNEL_INFO_OFFSET, "kernel_info at bad address!")
> > >
> > >         .rodata.mle_header MLE_HEADER_OFFSET : {
> > >                 *(.rodata.mle_header)
> > >         }
> > >         ASSERT(ABSOLUTE(mle_header) == MLE_HEADER_OFFSET, "mle_header at bad address!")
> > >
> > > arch/x86/boot/compressed/sl_stub.S:
> > > #define mleh_rva(X) (((X) - mle_header) + MLE_HEADER_OFFSET)
> > >
> > >         .section ".rodata.mle_header", "a"
> > >
> > > SYM_DATA_START(mle_header)
> > >         .long   0x9082ac5a    /* UUID0 */
> > >         .long   0x74a7476f    /* UUID1 */
> > >         .long   0xa2555c0f    /* UUID2 */
> > >         .long   0x42b651cb    /* UUID3 */
> > >         .long   0x00000034    /* MLE header size */
> > >         .long   0x00020002    /* MLE version 2.2 */
> > >         .long   mleh_rva(sl_stub_entry)    /* Linear entry point of MLE (virt. address) */
> > >         .long   0x00000000    /* First valid page of MLE */
> > >         .long   0x00000000    /* Offset within binary of first byte of MLE */
> > >         .long   0x00000000    /* Offset within binary of last byte + 1 of MLE */
> > >         .long   0x00000223    /* Bit vector of MLE-supported capabilities */
> > >         .long   0x00000000    /* Starting linear address of command line (unused) */
> > >         .long   0x00000000    /* Ending linear address of command line (unused) */
> > > SYM_DATA_END(mle_header)
> > >
> > > Of course MLE_HEADER_OFFSET has to be defined as a constant somewhere.
> > > Anyway, is it acceptable?
> 
> What do you think about my MLE_HEADER_OFFSET and related stuff proposal?
> 

I'm wondering if it would be easier to just allow relocations in these
special "header" sections. I need to check how easy/hard it is to do
that without triggering linker warnings.

Thanks.