[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201019174617.uf7andznyij75mpd@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:46:17 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>,
Paul Barker <pbarker@...sulko.com>,
Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 8/9] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: add Pulse
Per Second (PPS) support
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:24:34PM +0200, Christian Eggers wrote:
> static int ksz9477_ptp_enable(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct ptp_clock_request *req, int on)
> {
> - return -ENOTTY;
> + struct ksz_device *dev = container_of(ptp, struct ksz_device, ptp_caps);
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (req->type) {
> + case PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS:
> + mutex_lock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
> + ret = ksz9477_ptp_enable_pps(dev, on);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
> + return ret;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
Nope, this is not what you're looking for. Please implement
PTP_CLK_REQ_PEROUT.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists