[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18f2f9d4-5199-d6d0-f4f5-c17d609a44a7@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:52:09 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: make a const array static, makes object
smaller
Le 17/10/2020 à 02:11, Joe Perches a écrit :
> On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 23:33 +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> Don't populate const array filter_ies on the stack but instead
>> make it static. Makes the object code smaller by 261 bytes.
>>
>> Before:
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 21674 3166 448 25288 62c8 drivers/staging/wfx/sta.o
>>
>> After:
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 21349 3230 448 25027 61c3 drivers/staging/wfx/sta.o
>
> Thanks.
>
> It's odd to me it's so large a change as it's only
> 24 bytes of initialization. (3 entries, each 8 bytes)
>
The function looks small.
Maybe it is inlined by gcc in each of the 3 callers?
CJ
> This line in the same function:
>
> hif_set_beacon_filter_table(wvif, 3, filter_ies);
>
> might as well use ARRAY_SIZE(filter_ies) instead of 3
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists