[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201019191257.GU20115@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:12:57 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sfrench@...ba.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: kill add_to_page_cache_locked()
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 02:59:11PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> @@ -885,29 +886,30 @@ static int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
> page->mapping = NULL;
> /* Leave page->index set: truncation relies upon it */
> put_page(page);
> + __ClearPageLocked(page);
> return error;
> }
> -ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(__add_to_page_cache_locked, ERRNO);
I think you're missing:
+ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(__add_to_page_cache, ERRNO);
I see this:
> +int add_to_page_cache(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
> + pgoff_t offset, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - return __add_to_page_cache_locked(page, mapping, offset,
> - gfp_mask, NULL);
> + return __add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, offset, gfp_mask, NULL);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_to_page_cache_locked);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_to_page_cache);
> +ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(add_to_page_cache, ERRNO);
but I think that's insufficient because most calls are to
add_to_page_cache_lru(), which doesn't have an error injection point.
By the way, that CIFS code is going to go away with the fscache rewrite.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists