linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: fix memory leak in ti_cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202010200318.djhF2S7Z-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 03:15:02 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Defang Bo <bodefang@....com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Defang Bo <bodefang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: fix memory leak in
 ti_cpufreq_probe()

Hi Defang,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.9 next-20201016]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Defang-Bo/cpufreq-ti-cpufreq-fix-memory-leak-in-ti_cpufreq_probe/20201019-214548
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
config: arm-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/5a1fa3fa4d1aa57096d518b14240a0e5ea50c012
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Defang-Bo/cpufreq-ti-cpufreq-fix-memory-leak-in-ti_cpufreq_probe/20201019-214548
        git checkout 5a1fa3fa4d1aa57096d518b14240a0e5ea50c012
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c: In function 'ti_cpufreq_probe':
>> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:409:17: error: expected ';' before 'return'
     409 |  kfree(opp_data)
         |                 ^
         |                 ;
     410 |  return ret;
         |  ~~~~~~          
>> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:411:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
     411 | }
         | ^

vim +409 drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c

   322	
   323	static int ti_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   324	{
   325		u32 version[VERSION_COUNT];
   326		const struct of_device_id *match;
   327		struct opp_table *ti_opp_table;
   328		struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data;
   329		const char * const default_reg_names[] = {"vdd", "vbb"};
   330		int ret;
   331	
   332		match = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
   333		if (!match)
   334			return -ENODEV;
   335	
   336		opp_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*opp_data), GFP_KERNEL);
   337		if (!opp_data)
   338			return -ENOMEM;
   339	
   340		opp_data->soc_data = match->data;
   341	
   342		opp_data->cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
   343		if (!opp_data->cpu_dev) {
   344			pr_err("%s: Failed to get device for CPU0\n", __func__);
   345			ret = ENODEV;
   346			goto free_opp_data;
   347		}
   348	
   349		opp_data->opp_node = dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(opp_data->cpu_dev);
   350		if (!opp_data->opp_node) {
   351			dev_info(opp_data->cpu_dev,
   352				 "OPP-v2 not supported, cpufreq-dt will attempt to use legacy tables.\n");
   353			goto register_cpufreq_dt;
   354		}
   355	
   356		ret = ti_cpufreq_setup_syscon_register(opp_data);
   357		if (ret)
   358			goto fail_put_node;
   359	
   360		/*
   361		 * OPPs determine whether or not they are supported based on
   362		 * two metrics:
   363		 *	0 - SoC Revision
   364		 *	1 - eFuse value
   365		 */
   366		ret = ti_cpufreq_get_rev(opp_data, &version[0]);
   367		if (ret)
   368			goto fail_put_node;
   369	
   370		ret = ti_cpufreq_get_efuse(opp_data, &version[1]);
   371		if (ret)
   372			goto fail_put_node;
   373	
   374		ti_opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(opp_data->cpu_dev,
   375							   version, VERSION_COUNT);
   376		if (IS_ERR(ti_opp_table)) {
   377			dev_err(opp_data->cpu_dev,
   378				"Failed to set supported hardware\n");
   379			ret = PTR_ERR(ti_opp_table);
   380			goto fail_put_node;
   381		}
   382	
   383		opp_data->opp_table = ti_opp_table;
   384	
   385		if (opp_data->soc_data->multi_regulator) {
   386			const char * const *reg_names = default_reg_names;
   387	
   388			if (opp_data->soc_data->reg_names)
   389				reg_names = opp_data->soc_data->reg_names;
   390			ti_opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(opp_data->cpu_dev,
   391								 reg_names,
   392								 ARRAY_SIZE(default_reg_names));
   393			if (IS_ERR(ti_opp_table)) {
   394				dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(opp_data->opp_table);
   395				ret =  PTR_ERR(ti_opp_table);
   396				goto fail_put_node;
   397			}
   398		}
   399	
   400		of_node_put(opp_data->opp_node);
   401	register_cpufreq_dt:
   402		platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt", -1, NULL, 0);
   403	
   404		return 0;
   405	
   406	fail_put_node:
   407		of_node_put(opp_data->opp_node);
   408	free_opp_data:
 > 409		kfree(opp_data)
   410		return ret;
 > 411	}
   412	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (76238 bytes)