lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 22:39:35 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Check SEV encryption in
 64-bit boot-path

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:54:47PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Also, isn't it possible that the initial page tables we're running on
> have already been messed with and have the C-bit in the wrong location,
> so that this write happens decrypted?

The code assumes that the page-table it is running on has the correct C
bit position set and that the code which set it up verified that it is
correct. For the kernel itself this is true, at least, but when booting
via UEFI the check also needs to happen in the firmware.

Note that the possibilies are limited when the hypervisor reports the
wrong C bit position because code fetches always assume encryption, even
when the C bit is cleared in the page-table. So a wrong C bit position
in the decompression stub would write the kernel image to memory
unencrypted and executing it would not be possible.

Regards,

	Joerg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ