[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b8bb76e-5349-acff-117a-fb2b3192c4cb@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:28:30 +0800
From: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
To: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp <lkp@...ts.01.org>, 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: Unreliable will-it-scale context_switch1 test on 0day
bot
On 10/19/2020 11:24 PM, Philip Li wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:27:32AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I pointed out an issue with the will-it-scale context_switch1 test run by the 0day bot on
>> October 7, 2020, and got no reply.
> Thanks Mathieu for the feedback, we had added it to the TODO list but sorry for
> not reply in time.
>
> Zhengjun, can you help follow up this mail thread?
>
I have replied in the origin mail.
>>
>> Until this issue is solved, the results of those tests are basically pure noise when run on
>> SMT hardware:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1183082664.11002.1602082242482.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com/
>>
>> Who is maintaining those tests and the 0day bot ?
> will-it-scale itself is from community at https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
> and we will look for the support if we don't have quick solution. 0day bot basically wraps
> the test and analyze the result to find which commit leads to change.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu Desnoyers
>> EfficiOS Inc.
>> http://www.efficios.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> LKP mailing list -- lkp@...ts.01.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@...ts.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list -- lkp@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@...ts.01.org
>
--
Zhengjun Xing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists