linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] [v2] rtc: sun6i: Fix memleak in sun6i_rtc_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7821f744.b49c.17544924954.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:53:59 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From:   dinghao.liu@....edu.cn
To:     "Maxime Ripard" <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc:     kjlu@....edu, "Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@...e.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] [v2] rtc: sun6i: Fix memleak in sun6i_rtc_clk_init

> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 03:28:10PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > When clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy() fails,
> > clk_data should be freed. It's the same for the subsequent
> > two error paths, but we should also unregister the already
> > registered clocks in them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changelog:
> > 
> > v2: - Unregister the already registered clocks on failure.
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> > index e2b8b150bcb4..6de0d3ad736a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> > @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
> >  								300000000);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(rtc->int_osc)) {
> >  		pr_crit("Couldn't register the internal oscillator\n");
> > -		return;
> > +		goto err;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	parents[0] = clk_hw_get_name(rtc->int_osc);
> > @@ -290,7 +290,8 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
> >  	rtc->losc = clk_register(NULL, &rtc->hw);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(rtc->losc)) {
> >  		pr_crit("Couldn't register the LOSC clock\n");
> > -		return;
> > +		clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(rtc->int_osc);
> > +		goto err;
> >  	}
> 
> The point of having labels for the error sequence is to avoid to
> duplicate the error handling code in each and every error code path.
> 
> You should add another label for the fixed rate clock unregistration
> 

Fine, I will fix this soon.

Regards,
Dinghao