[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7eec99d5-e36b-ee5b-5b6c-1486e453a083@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:32:12 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: not link irqfd with a fake IRQ bypass producer
On 2020/10/19 下午5:06, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> In case failure to setup Post interrupt for an IRQ, it make no sense
> to assign irqfd->producer to the producer.
>
> This change makes code more robust.
It's better to describe what issue we will get without this patch.
Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index ce856e0..277e961 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10683,13 +10683,14 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
> container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
> int ret;
>
> - irqfd->producer = prod;
> kvm_arch_start_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
> ret = kvm_x86_ops.update_pi_irte(irqfd->kvm,
> prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1);
>
> if (ret)
> kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
> + else
> + irqfd->producer = prod;
>
> return ret;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists