linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] arm64: Add framework to turn IPI as NMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFA6WYN18oe9143offQ1V5RwnYZmvy29vPR0SKFtpkdOePezsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:37:24 +0530
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
        ito-yuichi@...itsu.com, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] arm64: Add framework to turn IPI as NMI

On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 17:26, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-10-14 12:12, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Introduce framework to turn an IPI as NMI using pseudo NMIs. In case a
> > particular platform doesn't support pseudo NMIs, then request IPI as a
> > regular IRQ.
> >
> > The main motivation for this feature is to have an IPI that can be
> > leveraged to invoke NMI functions on other CPUs. And current
> > prospective
> > users are NMI backtrace and KGDB CPUs round-up whose support is added
> > via future patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h | 16 +++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile   |  2 +-
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c  | 77
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c
>
> [...]
>
> > +     irq_set_status_flags(ipi, IRQ_HIDDEN);
>
> Another thing is this. Why are you hiding this from /proc/interrupts?
> The only reason the other IPIs are hidden is that displaying them as
> "normal" interrupts would be a change in userspace ABI.
>
> In your case, this is something new that can perfectly appear as
> a standard interrupt (and I don't see how you'd display the
> statistics otherwise).

Makes sense. I will remove this flag for this IPI so that it can be
displayed as a standard interrupt.

-Sumit

>
>          M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...