linux-kernel - [PATCH] net: xfrm: fix a race condition during allocing spi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201020081800.29454-1-zhuoliang.zhang@mediatek.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:18:00 +0800
From:   Zhuoliang Zhang <zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
        zhuoliang zhang <zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: xfrm: fix a race condition during allocing spi

From: zhuoliang zhang <zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com>

we found that the following race condition exists in
xfrm_alloc_userspi flow:

user thread                                    state_hash_work thread
----                                           ----
xfrm_alloc_userspi()
 __find_acq_core()
   /*alloc new xfrm_state:x*/
   xfrm_state_alloc()
   /*schedule state_hash_work thread*/
   xfrm_hash_grow_check()   	               xfrm_hash_resize()
 xfrm_alloc_spi                                  /*hold lock*/
      x->id.spi = htonl(spi)                     spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock)
      /*waiting lock release*/                     xfrm_hash_transfer()
      spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock)      /*add x into hlist:net->xfrm.state_byspi*/
	                                                hlist_add_head_rcu(&x->byspi)
                                                 spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock)

    /*add x into hlist:net->xfrm.state_byspi 2 times*/
    hlist_add_head_rcu(&x->byspi)

So the same xfrm_stame (x) is added into the same list_hash
(net->xfrm.state_byspi)2 times that makes the list_hash become
a inifite loop.

To fix the race,x->id.spi = htonl(spi) in the xfrm_alloc_spi() 
is moved to the back of spin_lock_bh,sothat state_hash_work thread 
no longer add x which id.spi is zero into the hash_list.

Signed-off-by: zhuoliang zhang <zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index bbd4643d7e82..a77da7aae6fe 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -2004,6 +2004,7 @@ int xfrm_alloc_spi(struct xfrm_state *x, u32 low, u32 high)
 	int err = -ENOENT;
 	__be32 minspi = htonl(low);
 	__be32 maxspi = htonl(high);
+	__be32 newspi = 0;
 	u32 mark = x->mark.v & x->mark.m;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
@@ -2022,21 +2023,22 @@ int xfrm_alloc_spi(struct xfrm_state *x, u32 low, u32 high)
 			xfrm_state_put(x0);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
-		x->id.spi = minspi;
+		newspi = minspi;
 	} else {
 		u32 spi = 0;
 		for (h = 0; h < high-low+1; h++) {
 			spi = low + prandom_u32()%(high-low+1);
 			x0 = xfrm_state_lookup(net, mark, &x->id.daddr, htonl(spi), x->id.proto, x->props.family);
 			if (x0 == NULL) {
-				x->id.spi = htonl(spi);
+				newspi = htonl(spi);
 				break;
 			}
 			xfrm_state_put(x0);
 		}
 	}
-	if (x->id.spi) {
+	if (newspi) {
 		spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
+		x->id.spi = newspi;
 		h = xfrm_spi_hash(net, &x->id.daddr, x->id.spi, x->id.proto, x->props.family);
 		hlist_add_head_rcu(&x->byspi, net->xfrm.state_byspi + h);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
-- 
2.18.0