[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201020084600.GA3838202@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:00 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: josephjang@...gle.com
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, pavel@....cz,
len.brown@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
jonglin@...gle.com, woodylin@...gle.com, markcheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: suspend: Add suspend timeout handler
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 08:15:38AM +0000, josephjang@...gle.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 02:22:26PM +0800, Joseph Jang wrote:
> > > Add sleep timer and timeout handler to prevent device stuck during
> > suspend/
> > > resume process. The timeout handler will dump disk sleep task at first
> > > round timeout and trigger kernel panic at second round timeout.
> > > The default timer for each round is defined in
> > > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_TIMER_TIMEOUT.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joseph Jang <josephjang@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> > > include/linux/console.h | 1 +
> > > include/linux/suspend_timer.h | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> > Why is this file in include/linux/ if you only ever call it from one .c
> > file?
>
> I just refer to include/linux/suspend.h and create a new header file in the
> same folder.
> If you have a better location for the new header file, please feel free to
> let me know.
Only put .h files that are needed by different .c files in the
include/linux/ directory. Otherwise it should be local to where the .c
file is.
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/linux/suspend_timer.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > > +#ifndef _LINUX_SLEEP_TIMER_H
> > > +#define _LINUX_SLEEP_TIMER_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_MONITOR
> > > +struct sleep_timer {
> > > + struct task_struct *tsk;
> > > + struct timer_list timer;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define DECLARE_SLEEP_TIMER(st) > > + struct sleep_timer st
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * init_sleep_timer - Initialize sleep timer.
> > > + * @st: Sleep timer to initialize.
> > > + * @func: Sleep timer timeout handler.
> > > + */
> > > +static void init_sleep_timer(struct sleep_timer *st, void (*func))
> > > +{
> > > + struct timer_list *timer = &st->timer;
> > > +
> > > + timer_setup(timer, func, 0);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * start_sleep_timer - Enable sleep timer to monitor suspend thread.
> > > + * @st: Sleep timer to enable.
> > > + */
> > > +static void start_sleep_timer(struct sleep_timer *st)
> > > +{
> > > + struct timer_list *timer = &st->timer;
> > > +
> > > + st->tsk = current;
> > > +
> > > + /* use same timeout value for both suspend and resume */
> > > + timer->expires = jiffies + HZ * CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_TIMER_TIMEOUT;
> > > + add_timer(timer);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * stop_sleep_timer - Disable sleep timer.
> > > + * @st: sleep timer to disable.
> > > + */
> > > +static void stop_sleep_timer(struct sleep_timer *st)
> > > +{
> > > + struct timer_list *timer = &st->timer;
> > > +
> > > + del_timer_sync(timer);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * sleep_timeout_handler - sleep timer timeout handler.
> > > + * @t: The timer list that sleep timer depends on.
> > > + *
> > > + * Called when suspend thread has timeout suspending or resuming.
> > > + * Dump all uninterruptible tasks' call stack and call panic() to
> > > + * reboot system in second round timeout.
> > > + */
> > > +static void sleep_timeout_handler(struct timer_list *t)
> > > +{
> > > + struct sleep_timer *st = from_timer(st, t, timer);
> > > + static int timeout_count;
> > > +
> > > + pr_info("Sleep timeout (timer is %d seconds)\n",
> > > + (CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_TIMER_TIMEOUT));
> > > + show_stack(st->tsk, NULL, KERN_EMERG);
> > > + show_state_filter(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > +
> > > + if (timeout_count < 1) {
> > > + timeout_count++;
> > > + start_sleep_timer(st);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (console_is_suspended())
> > > + resume_console();
> > > +
> > > + panic("Sleep timeout and panic\n");
> > > +}
> > > +#else
> > > +#define DECLARE_SLEEP_TIMER(st)
> > > +#define init_sleep_timer(x, y)
> > > +#define start_sleep_timer(x)
> > > +#define stop_sleep_timer(x)
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* _LINUX_SLEEP_TIMER_H */
> > > diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> > > index a7320f07689d..9e2b274db0c1 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> > > @@ -207,6 +207,21 @@ config PM_SLEEP_DEBUG
> > > def_bool y
> > > depends on PM_DEBUG && PM_SLEEP
> > >
> > > +config PM_SLEEP_MONITOR
> > > + bool "Linux kernel suspend/resume process monitor"
> > > + depends on PM_SLEEP
> > > + help
> > > + This option will enable sleep timer to prevent device stuck
> > > + during suspend/resume process. Sleep timeout handler will dump
> > > + disk sleep task at first round timeout and trigger kernel panic
> > > + at second round timeout. The timer for each round is defined in
> > > + CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_TIMER_TIMEOUT.
>
> > I thought we already had a watchdog for all of this, why not just always
> > add this to that code, for that config option?
>
>
> Yes, we already have DPM_WATCHDOG to monitor device power management.
Great, use that!
> But we really hit the suspend hang issue that DPM_WATCHDOG cannot cover.
What issue is that?
> We propose a wide coverage debug feature like PM_SLEEP_MONITOR which
> not only covers PM but also core PM hang issues.
>
> And DPM_WATCHDOG is for device driver power management in
> drivers/base/power/main.c
> and PM_SLEEP_MONITOR locate is for core power management in
> kernel/power/suspend.c.
> I think it is fine for users to select whether they need device PM only or
> not.
How will a user know which they should use?
Why not just fix whatever is wrong with the watchdog code instead of
creating a new one?
> > And why isn't the watchdog sufficient for you? Why are you "open
> > coding" a watchdog timer logic here at all???
>
> Yes, we refer to DPM_WATCHDOG to extend the watchdog debugging for core PM.
> Because we really hit a real case that was not covered by DPM_WATCHDOG.
Then fix that!
> I think PM_SLEEP_MONITOR is an extension debug feature from DPM_WATCHDOG.
Please just fix the watchdog, as obviously it is not working properly.
Don't create something new because of that.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists