lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201020092246.GE4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:22:46 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux.walleij@...aro.org, prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com, jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org,
        robh@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        pmladek@...e.com, mchehab@...nel.org, tian.shu.qiu@...el.com,
        bingbu.cao@...el.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
        yong.zhi@...el.com, rafael@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        kitakar@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/9] software_node: Add helper function to
 unregister arrays of software_nodes ordered parent to child

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:58:55PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Software nodes that are children of another software node should be
> unregistered before their parent. To allow easy unregistering of an array
> of software_nodes ordered parent to child, add a helper function to loop
> over and unregister nodes in such an array in reverse order.

> Suggested-by: Andriy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

For all patches Andriy -> Andy (email stays as above!).

...

> +/**
> + * software_node_unregister_nodes_reverse - Unregister an array of software
> + * nodes in reverse order.

Can you shrink this to one line?

Something like dropping ' in reverse order.' and adding it below...

> + * @nodes: Array of software nodes to be unregistered.
> + *

...like here to explain reversed order?

> + * NOTE: The same warning applies as with software_node_unregister_nodes.

software_node_unregister_nodes()

> + * Unless you are _sure_ that the array of nodes is ordered parent to child
> + * it is wiser to remove them individually in the correct order.
> + */
> +void software_node_unregister_nodes_reverse(const struct software_node *nodes)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i = 0;
> +
> +	while (nodes[i].name)
> +		i++;
> +
> +	while (i--)
> +		software_node_unregister(&nodes[i]);
> +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ